When the Faculty of Social
Sciences and the Department of Sociology presented South Asian University’s
first theatrical performance on 26 April 26 2012, ‘The Birth of
Dreamers’, the aim was not to create the century’s best crafted play in Delhi
and look for awards. On the contrary, the aim was to help establish a space for
creativity, which up to now is by and large absent in the university. True
enough, one cannot establish institutions and their best practices overnight. In
our context, the usual words used to describe that absence is “teething problems”,
which I personally think should be banished from our institutional vocabulary
and may be even from the English language, if that would help.
 |
| Open air rehearsals; Photo: Dev Pahak |
I have never believed that limits
could be imposed on the act of trying and the worlds of anticipation. Though
conventionally the creation of such a space is considered to be part of the
general responsibility of a University’s central structures, there is nothing
to stop an individual faculty, a department , a teacher or student to make an effort; to take the risk; to spend
the time. But of course one can do so only if a certain degree of selflessness
can be expected from the movers and shakers of such ideas. And pioneers cannot
be shackled by conventional wisdom or short-term hurdles. It would have better
served my colleague Dev Pathak who came up with the idea if he had spent the
time reading what sociologists usually read and churning out a few papers thinking
of his own academic future and promotional prospects. Such a focus in the long
run would have also helped the department climb a few notches up the zillion institutional
grading scales that now haunt the known academic universe. The director Tarique
Hameed who has nothing to do with the South Asian University must have quite
possibly lost his own money in training our young people in the art and craft
of acting, diction and everything else in between. But then, he had the passion
and the creative madness as did other members of his team to spend the time and
energy on a project that captured their imagination with no anticipation of
profit. That naturally made a significant difference. On the other hand, the Department of
Sociology made a crucial decision early on when the drama workshop and theater
production program was being planned. Though initially planned for its own
students, a decision was made at the outset to expand its scope beyond the
department and beyond the Faculty of Social Sciences. This allowed students
from departments of Computer Science, Economics among others to become part of
the effort if they had the interest. It
also helped that the measly budget requested was unhesitatingly and quickly
approved by the president of the university. It was also quite heartening to
see that many academics, students and administrators had come to watch the
event.
 |
| Open air rehearsals; Photo: Dev Pathak |
I do not intend to explore the logistics of this
endeavor or to review the play. I would rather think a bit about dreams; their
capacity and the worlds they might open up. The power of dreams which I have
always believed in came back to my mind not when I read the title of the play
displayed in the elegantly designed posters that were smiling at us from many
of the walls in the university, but when one of the characters uttered the
words “This is my dream, and the university
will be mine too; who the hell is registrar to run my dream; who the hell is
registrar to run my university.” It also reminded me of an essay I wrote
for my regular column ‘Alternate Space’ (The Island, Colombo) in February
2002 titled ‘A Land where Dreams have Died.’ That was based was on the
experience in a southern Sri Lankan town where economic difficulties, lack of
facilities in schools and the entrenchment of an uncreative and dogmatic system
of education had effectively dried up the capacity to dream of an entire
generation. They were prisoners of their times and circumstances. And what was
most shocking was that they were unaware that their dreams had been expelled;
banished from their collective consciousness. I am convinced even when the
ravages of time would take a toll on my memories, the land where dreams had
died would continue to haunt me.
 |
| Theater exercises; Photo: Dev Pathak |
 |
| Theater exercises: Photo: Dev Pathak |
But that reality is not something
peculiar to a distant Sri Lankan village or to other such remote localities in
the rural hinterlands of the wider South Asian landscape. It is entirely
possible a similar situation might exist right here in Delhi today; it is more
than possible that such a state of affairs may exist within our own
institution. What would our world be like if the youth amongst us merely
whispered sweet nothings to their test tubes imprisoned within their glittering
labs assuming they have conquered the world? What would life mean to young minds
whose collective experiences hardly extended beyond their romance with software
and hardware, which knitted both their personal and professional lives together?
How would the world manifest to a generation whose points of reference are
dictated by a wilderness of pie-charts and predictable data sets and the mantra-like
memorization of reams of court judgments of bygone eras? What kind of citizens
would we usher into the world if we encourage our young people to assume that
rote-taking of classroom material and ritualized seminars by well groomed
academic performers would bring the intricacies of global power-play into their
systems of reckoning? Would the endless revisiting of Marx, Weber and more
recent pundits take the young ones amongst us anywhere close to reading
contemporary society and culture? If this our reality or if this is where we
are headed, I would suggest it is a clear recipe to ensure that the dreams of
an entire generation would not only be killed, but that the capacity to dream
itself would be forgotten. That is what conventional education lacking in both
wisdom and imagination would bring. That is why the limits of conventional knowledge
need to be understood by those who teach as well as those who learn.
 |
| Birth of Dreamers; Photo: S. Perera |
Now let me get back to the play itself and what it
means. The entire rhetoric and the politics encapsulated in the words, “this is my dream, and the university will be mine too;
who the hell is registrar to run my dream?; who the hell is registrar to run my
university?” needs to be read in the context outlined above. It is not a
simple pot-shot at a person or an office. I believe we are not on the business
of pettiness. It is an utterance impregnated with meanings about the nature of
education and imagination in our times; in our immediate circumstances. Quite
literally, if our capacity to dream is stunted due to limitations of our
educational approaches as well as resources, we would end up creating a brave
new world in the Orwellian sense which has lost sight of its humanity. In the simple one
act play packaged within twenty minutes, the young characters who proclaim to
be dreamers in their own right resist limitations and structures imposed on
them by institutional rituals and expectations. For them, it is unacceptable to
dream in tune with politically based associations in society as well as formal
structures of entities such as universities. They want to dream on their own as
they feel fit in spite of the divisions and borders enacted by caste, creed, ideology,
market, and other forces. For the dreamers who want to be free, these vested interests
or dream merchants of our times are merely conventional systems that limit
their capacity to think. This does not mean that the dreams of individuals and institutions
will always be oppositional; in fact, there can be many instances when these
converge. The bottom line is that the play is an ideological statement about
the capacity of the individual and certain collectives to think free of
hindrances and expectation of others. After all, doesn’t thinking start with
the ability to dream?
 |
|
 |
| Birth of Dreamers: Photos: S. Perera |
As I said at the beginning, the
play was produced not to seek fame or to win awards but to create a certain
kind of space in the university. Hopefully that space has been demarcated and
would be used more often in times to come. We have tested what is possible and
have come to grips with where we stand and what needs to be done. The future is
not about revisiting the realm of possibilities that has already been visited
and captured. It is about transgressing the borders of what is possible into
the veritable impossible, and making those domains our own. That can only come
through the ability to dream and not through regular classes or accepting what
exists as inevitable. In times and circumstances where frustration seems like
one’s own shadow and anger manifests as an alter ego, I thought my own capacity
to dream had disappeared. It was no accident that a writers’ block exhausted my
creative impulses over the last two months where I could not write a single
poem despite the thoughts gallivanting around in my mind. I must thank the
young dreamers for letting me know that my own capacity to dream is still intact
despite the odds and helping lift my writers’ block as the soft rays of the
morning sun would expel rain clouds.
 |
| Birth of Dreamers: conclusion; Photo: Tarique Hameed |
 |
| Birth of Dreamers: post conclusion celebrations; Photo: Tarique Hameed |
